The rhetoric contrasts sharply with a statement released last week by Peter Goettler, president and CEO of the Cato Institute, which called the attack on Capitol Hill “a direct attack on the United States Constitution, the rule of law. and our constitutional republic ”.
Illarionov’s comments are now “in discussion between senior management” and directly with Illarionov, said Corie Whalen, spokesperson for Cato.
“The Cato Institute’s management team categorically rejects the claims made in the blog post by Mr. Illarionov,” Whalen said in a statement to POLITICO. “The matter is being discussed between senior management and with Mr. Illarionov. Violent disruption of constitutional processes is unacceptable and must be unequivocally rejected. Crowd rule is not a path to freedom. Attempting to keep a defeated president in power by force strikes at the heart of the provisions of the Constitution to protect the rights and freedoms of the American people.
Cato is one of the many institutions and entities that have again attempted to distance themselves from President Donald Trump and his allies in the wake of the deadly attack on Capitol Hill. But some analysts have raised concerns that Illarionov’s comments are legitimized by virtue of his affiliation with the think tank, and again raise the specter of Russian attempts to wreak havoc and doubt over the legitimacy of the elections. American.
Ilya Zaslavskiy, a researcher who is currently leading a project on post-Soviet kleptocracy, called Illarionov’s messages “downright dangerous,” noting that they are widely shared in Russia and among Russian-American Trump supporters.
“Appearing academic and analytical, it further fuels hatred and insurgency,” Zaslavskiy said.
According to the biography of the Cato Institute by Illarionov, he was Putin’s “main economic adviser” from 2000 to December 2005 and “is a long-time friend of the Cato Institute”. Illarionov did not immediately respond to a request for comment.