A CBP spokesperson at the time neither confirmed nor denied the memo’s authenticity. but previously called reports that the agency had issued such a directive “false”.
“As a matter of principle, US Customs and Border Protection do not comment on pending litigation,” agency spokesman Jason Givens said in response to the document’s production. “However, the absence of a comment should not be interpreted as an agreement or a stipulation with any of the claims.”
Acting CBP commissioner Mark Morgan tried to push the agency’s headquarters away from controversy in February, refusing any “national guidelines” to target travelers based on country of origin. He said the actions of the Seattle office were “not in line with our direction, and that was immediately corrected and was very unique to this industry.”
More information: An earlier version of the directive described questions that border officers at the Seattle field office were to direct to travelers detained for secondary inspection. They focused on the past military service of individuals or their family members, where they attended school and on their careers.
“Some industries are linked to the government, trying to know as much about their occupation, their position, the history of the company, especially if the company existed during the reconstruction after the Iraq-Iran war,” the document said.
Judge’s reasoning: U.S. District Court Chief Justice Ricardo Martinez has authorized CBP to continue to redact certain documents describing law enforcement tactics and procedures while releasing information relating to “illegal activity under -jacent ”.
“The court order makes it clear that the government illegally sought to cover up illegal behavior because the directive unlawfully targeted individuals based solely on their national origin,” said Matt Adams, NWIRP legal director, in a statement. communicated.